Legal Opinion
Ivan N. Schatz Joann B. Schatz v. Mark E. Rosenberg Mer Enterprises, Incorporated Stephen Jaeger Weinberg & Green
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 9, 1991No. 90-1889PublishedCited by 222 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs/appellants Ivan and Joanne Schatz sued defendants Mark E. Rosenberg, MER Enterprises (“MER”) and the law firm of Weinberg & Green alleging RICO violations, fraud and securities laws violations. The district judge referred the case to a magistrate judge who recommended that five counts of the seven count complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The district judge agreed and dismissed these five counts under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Three of these counts involved Weinberg & Green. In…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dirks v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,922 James Bloor v. Carro, Spanbock, Londin, Rodman & FassCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by222 opinions
- Maria Jimena Ibarra v. United States of America Unknown Government OfficersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Patricia J. Mayes v. Stanley Rapoport Judith Rapoport David Key, D/B/A Key Coffee Roasters, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Stratagene v. Parsons Behle & LatimerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Brown v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.