Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Holcomb

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2007No. 200,448-2PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

173 P.3d 898 (2007)

In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST James Byron HOLCOMB, an attorney at law.

No. 200,448-2.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued September 11, 2007.

Decided December 20, 2007.

Brett Andrews Purtzer, Attorney at Law, Tacoma, WA, James Byron Holcomb, Attorney at Law, Bainbridge Island, WA, for Petitioner.

M. Craig Bray, Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

FAIRHURST, J.

¶ 1 James Byron Holcomb appeals the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) Disciplinary Board's (Board) recommendation that he be suspended from the practice of law…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGlothlenWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Bohn v. CodyWashington Supreme Court · 1992

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against TrejoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against TrejoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against EugsterWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In Re Proceeding Against FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API