Sponseller v. Meltebeke
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.
On December 29,1976, plaintiff, the purchaser of a used house, brought this action for damages against the defendant, the builder-seller of the house, for breach of implied warranty and fraud. Defendant demurred to the complaint. The demurrer was sustained on a number of grounds. The breach of warranty action was held barred by the running of the 10-year statute of ultimate repose, ORS 12.135. In addition, the trial court held that neither the breach of warranty count nor the fraud count stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The former ruling was based on the doctrine of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yepsen v. BurgessOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Medford v. Pacific National Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Porter Construction Co. v. BerryOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Menefee v. BlitzOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Griffith v. HanfordOregon Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by19 opinions
- Altevogt v. BrinkoetterIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Certainteed Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Securities-Intermountain, Inc. v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Adams v. Oregon State PoliceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- New England Power Co. v. Riley Stoker Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.