Legal Opinion

Kunkel Plumbing and Heating Company v. Estes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 3, 1959No. 38454PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

This is an action for a money judgment on a written contract which plaintiff alleged it entered into with defendant for the sale and installation of a heating unit in defendant’s new home. Plaintiff alleged it had fully complied with the terms of the contract and there was due and owing $800, the amount specified in the contract, all of which defendant neglected and refused to pay.

Defendant answered alleging both express warranties and implied fitness; violation of both warranties because the heating unit did not function properly. Defendant also filed a cross petition alleging…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Howard v. FarrarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Puls v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Riddle v. GarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. CookseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Busboom v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paris Bank of Texas v. CusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Simpson Properties, Inc. v. Oexco, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Simpson Properties, Inc. v. Oexco, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API