Kunkel Plumbing and Heating Company v. Estes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
This is an action for a money judgment on a written contract which plaintiff alleged it entered into with defendant for the sale and installation of a heating unit in defendant’s new home. Plaintiff alleged it had fully complied with the terms of the contract and there was due and owing $800, the amount specified in the contract, all of which defendant neglected and refused to pay.
Defendant answered alleging both express warranties and implied fitness; violation of both warranties because the heating unit did not function properly. Defendant also filed a cross petition alleging…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Howard v. FarrarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Puls v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Riddle v. GarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. CookseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Busboom v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Paris Bank of Texas v. CusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Simpson Properties, Inc. v. Oexco, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
- Simpson Properties, Inc. v. Oexco, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996