Legal Opinion

Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Cooksey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 15, 1912No. 2166PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Greer County; G. A. Brown, Judge. Action by the Spaulding Manufacturing Company against W. E. Cooksey on a promissory note. Judgment for defendant on a counterclaim, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

On June 7, 1909, plaintiff sued defendant in the district court of Greer county to recover the sum of $75 and interest alleged to be due on a certain promissory note. In the original petition, plaintiff claimed to be a corporation, but in the amended petition they are shown to be a partnership with its principal place of business at Grinnell, Iowa. Defendant on August 21, 1909, filed a plea in abatement, setting up that at the time the note was executed plaintiff had a principal place of business at Mangum, Okla., and was doing business under a fictitious name, or a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. HolidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bokoshe Smokeless Coal Co. v. BraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Spaulding v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Moline Plow Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Kansas City Hay Press Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Western Silo Co. v. CousinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API