Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Vokal v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 3, 1949No. 12209PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BONE, Circuit Judge.

Paul F. Vokal and his wife Freda M. Vokal (by virtue of the Community Property Laws of the State of California) owned and operated a tool and machinery business in Los Angeles, California. During 1943 they manufactured certain tools and machinery under government contracts and subcontracts. On December 19, 1944 they entered into a formal renegotiation agreement with the War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, pursuant to the Renegotiation Act 1, by virtue of which it was deter*621mined and agreed that $38,442.26 of the profits received or accrued by the Vokals under contracts or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. MacAuley v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Mutual Life Insurance v. PhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. United States v. Strontium Products Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1946
  5. Pownall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. FaillaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  2. In re LindseyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. United States v. Maguire Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  4. United States v. FaillaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  5. In re CarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API