Legal Opinion
United States v. Philip Morris, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 1, 2002No. Civ.A. 99-2496(GK)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the United States of America (“the Government”) has brought suit against Joint Defendants, 1 pursuant to Sections 1962(c) and (d) of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. The Government seeks to enjoin Joint Defendants from engaging in fraudulent and other unlawful conduct and to order Joint Defendants to disgorge the proceeds of their past unlawful activity. 2
This matter is now before the Court on Joint Defendants’ Motion to Enforce Jury Demand [#882], Upon consideration of the motion,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- United States v. British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.