United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
This matter is now before the Court on the United States’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Defendants’ Affirmative Defenses That the RICO Claims and Sought Relief Are Prohibited by the Tenth Amendment and Separation of Powers and That Defendants Are Not Jointly and Severally Liable for any Disgorgement Ordered by the Court (“Motion”). Defendants 1 have asserted as affirmative defenses that the Government’s RICO claims and the relief it seeks are prohibited by the Tenth Amendment and separation of powers principles. They also argue that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Printz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Prudential Insurance v. BenjaminSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Loving v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- TJX Companies, Inc. v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- American Federation of Teachers v. BullockDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Allstate Insurance Company v. Better Hands Physical Therapy, P.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.