Legal Opinion

Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 14, 2006No. Consol. 05-00324PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POGUE, Judge.

In Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United States, 30 CIT-, 425 F.Supp.2d 1321 (2006) this court found that certain producers/exporters of goods from Canada to the United States, Plaintiffs in this proceeding, had standing and a cause of action to challenge the application of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (commonly known, and referred to herein, as the “Byrd Amendment”), and that Plaintiffs’ actions were not barred by the political question doctrine. The court further found that the Defendant Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) was…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  2. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
  3. Mittal Steel Galati S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  4. Jacobi Carbons AB and Jacobi Carbons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
  5. Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Synthes (U.S.A.)District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API