Justice v. East St. Louis City Lines, Inc.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
PRITCHARD, Commissioner.
In this action for personal injuries, wherein the prayer for damages is for $150,000, plaintiff appeals from a judgment against her based upon the sustaining of defendant’s motion for directed verdict by the trial court at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, which the trial court stated presented no jury question.
In determining the propriety of the trial court’s action, we are guided by the rule that plaintiff’s evidence must be viewed in its light most favorable to her, including all favorable inferences reasonably deducible therefrom. Keeney v. Callow, Mo., 349 S.W.2d…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bayer v. American Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Nelson v. O'LearySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Osterhaus v. Gladstone Hotel CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Lutz v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- Keeney v. CallowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wehrkamp v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Wiseman v. Missouri Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Robinson v. GerberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Moore v. EdenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Chappell v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.