Lutz v. Chicago Transit Authority
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dempsey
At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case, in her suit against the. Chicago Transit Authority for personal injury, the court sustained the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and instructed the jury to find the issues for the defendant. Bose Lutz, the plaintiff, appeals from the judgment entered upon the verdict of not guilty.
Mrs. Lutz, a widow who had been working for 36 years, left her place of employment at Diversey and Damen Avenues at 4:30 p. m., November 18, 1954. She boarded the defendant’s eastbound Diversey Avenue bus and sat near the front door in the middle of the three-place…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Neering v. I.C.R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
- Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. OswaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- Johnston v. City of East MolineIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
- Molloy v. Chicago Rapid Transit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Sandy v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Home Indemnity Co. v. Reynolds & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Brill v. DavajonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- Watson v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Gauchas v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.