Legal Opinion

Chappell v. City of Springfield

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 12, 1965No. 50473PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGER, Judge.

This appeal arises from the trial of two consolidated actions in each of which the plaintiffs charged the defendant city with the operation of a continuing nuisance in connection with its sewage disposal plant southwest of the city. One suit was instituted by Fred S. Chappell and his wife, the other by nine different married couples. These various plaintiffs were the owners of separate tracts in the vicinity of the plant, located in various directions and at various distances from it. The distances varied from one quarter of a mile to one mile, and the directions from south to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Delay Ex Rel. Delay v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Nelson v. O'LearySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Flanigan v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  4. Osterhaus v. Gladstone Hotel CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Graves v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bower v. Hog Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  2. Stewart v. City of MarshfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Teichman v. Potashnick Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. Hewitt v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Owens v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API