Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 15, 1991No. ACMR 9000327PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Senior Judge:

Appellant was tried by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of three specifications of sodomy, one specification of attempted sodomy, four specifications of indecent liberties, and two specifications of rape in violation of Articles 125, 134, and 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925, 934, and 920 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. He pled not guilty but was found guilty of one specification of obstruction of justice in violation of Article 134, UCMJ. Appellant was sentenced to a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. Solorio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. GuerreroUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  5. United States v. TedderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. JohnsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  3. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  4. United States v. SmithU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API