United States v. Reinhold
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION and ORDEÉ
SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendants’ motions (i) to sever pursuant to Rule 8(b) and Rule 14 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Fed.R.Crim.P.); (ii) to dismiss the Second Superseding Indictment (“SSI”) for improper joinder and for prosecutorial misuse of the grand jury; and (iii) for the Government to provide a bill of particulars and Brady material. For the reasons stated, these motions are denied.
Factual Background
The following are the pertinent facts alleged in the indictment.
Defendant Irving Goldstein and his wife owned and operated…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Alexander Bortnovsky, A/K/A "Sasha," Leonid BrazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Bin LadenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- United States v. SattarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- United States v. SattarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- United States v. TrippeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- United States v. OhleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.