Legal Opinion
Hyman v. Market Street Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 23, 1940No. Civ. 11174PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Plaintiff brought this action for injuries alleged to have been received in a collision between a streetcar owned and operated by the defendant Market Street Railway Company, on which she was riding as a passenger, and a Municipal Railway streetcar owned and operated by the defendant City and County of San Francisco. From a judgment in favor of the two defendants, entered upon a jury verdict, plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.
The collision occurred at the intersection of Market, Mc-Allister and Jones Streets in San Francisco at about 7:00 o’clock P. M. on the evening of September 11, 1937. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Kline v. Santa Barbara Etc. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Scandalis v. JennyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Osgood v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Steele v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Parker v. WomackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Louie v. Hagstrom's Food Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Martindale v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Raliway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Weddle v. LogesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Hooper v. BronsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.