Legal Opinion

Lindemann v. Mobil Oil Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 23, 1996No. 95 C 7724PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CASTILLO, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiff Diane Lindemann charges that defendant Mobil Oil Corporation terminated her in retaliation for her prior use of short-term disability benefits (sick leave). Presently pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. Mobil argues that the reason Lindemann was fired was her many absences, not her use of benefits per se, and that absenteeism is a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for her termination. Lindemann agrees that she “was discharged solely due to absences,” Pl.’s Mem.Supp. of Second Mot.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Langford v. County of CookDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  2. Dockery v. Maryville Acad.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Bilow v. Much Shelist Freed Denenberg Ament & Eiger, P.C.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  4. Bilow v. MUCH SHELIST FREED DENENBERG AMENTDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  5. Dockery v. Maryville AcademyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API