Legal Opinion
Bilow v. Much Shelist Freed Denenberg Ament & Eiger, P.C.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 18, 1999No. 98 C 7627PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Sharon Swarensky Bilow, an attorney representing herself, sues her former employer, the law firm of Much Shelist Freed Denenberg Ament & Eiger, P.C. (“the Firm”), alleging various claims under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seg., and Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. She also presents several pendant state law claims for relief. At base, Bilow contends that the Firm owes her money for employee benefits it wrongfully denied to her, and that it fired her because she is a woman or in retaliation for her various complaints about the Firm. The…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anne Dey v. Colt Construction & Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bilow v. Much Shelist Freed Denenberg Ament & Rubenstein, P.C.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Bilow v. MUCH SHELIST FREED DENENBERG AMENTDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999