Legal Opinion
Sanford v. Kepner
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 9, 1951No. 3370PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
This action is the outgrowth of an interference proceeding in the Patent Office, No. 82,623, declared by the .Commissioner of Patents between the party Sanford and the party Kepner to determine which of them was the prior inventor of certain patentable subject matter common to their respective applications for patent, namely, Kepner Application Serial No. 497,286, filed August 4, 1943, and Sanford Application Serial No. 571,170, filed January 3, 1945. Consequently, upon the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the Patent Office in Interference No. 82,623,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Williams Manufacturing Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cleveland Trust Co. v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Smith v. Carter Carburetor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Beidler v. CapsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1972
- Sunbeam Corporation v. SW Farber, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Turchan v. Bailey Meter Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1958