Legal Opinion

Turchan v. Bailey Meter Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 29, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 1703PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAYTON, District Judge.

This is a suit under Title 35 U.S.C.A. Section 146, formerly United States Revised Statutes § 4915, in which the plaintiffs are asking the Court to adjudge that they are entitled to a patent. The judgment requested is that the Commissioner of Patents be advised that the plaintiffs are entitled to a patent provided they otherwise comply with the laws of the United States relating to patents.

The plaintiffs are applicants in a joint application for a patent filed in the Patent Office, and the defendant is the assignee of the entire interest of a patent application filed in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Otto Henning v. Scott F. HuntCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  5. Sanford v. KepnerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eastern Electric, Inc. v. Seeburg CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  2. Ellis-Foster Company and Montclair Research Laboratories v. Union Carbide and Carbon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  3. Robert C. Switzer and Richard A. Ward v. Loy W. Sockman and Elliot W. BradyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  4. Radio Corp. of America v. Philco Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Robert C. Switzer and Richard A. Ward v. Loy W. Sockman and Elliot W. BradyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API