Legal Opinion
Lo Sacco v. Young
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 28, 1989No. 13420PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Per curiam
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the Appellate Court erred in limiting its review of the plaintiff’s claims to plain error based on the plaintiff’s untimely filing of a motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, even though the defendants did not object to the untimely motion. We conclude that the defendants waived their rights with respect to the defect and thus the Appellate Court should not have limited its review to plain error.
On November 5, 1985, the plaintiff, Frank X. Lo Sacco, instituted an action against three defendants, Debra M. Young, Lori Golab and Kim Billian.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Orticelli v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Coelho v. Posi-Seal International, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. PareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.