Legal Opinion

Sacrison v. Evjene

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2017No. DA 16-0699PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Plaintiffs Hans E. Sacrison and Leana F. Sacrison (Sacrisons) appeal the partial summary judgment entered by the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, in favor of Defendant Jeffrey M. Evjene (Evjene). The appeal comes before us upon certification pursuant to M. R. Civ. P. 54(b). We address the following issue:

Did the District Court err by granting partial summary judgment on a record containing genuine conflicts in material facts?

¶2 We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 This case involves a boundary dispute involving three adjacent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goodover v. Lindey's, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Larsen v. RichardsonMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Whary v. Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P.Montana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Pilgrim v. KuipersMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Karlson v. RosichMontana Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pueblo Of Jemez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API