Karlson v. Rosich
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 Ludvik Rosich (Rosich) appeals from the findings of fact, conclusions of law and order entered by the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County, declaring the boundary line between properties owned by Rosich and Aliene K. Karlson (Karlson). We reverse and remand.
¶2 We address the following issue on appeal:
¶3 Did the District Court err in determining the boundary line between the parties’ properties?
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶4 Clyde and Myrtle Norman (Normans) owned a parcel of real property on the east lakeshore of Flathead Lake, being a part or portion of Government Lot 4,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hansen v. 75 Ranch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
- Skinner v. Allstate Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
- Dell v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- Leeper v. LeeperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Arkansas Presbytery of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church v. Hudson Ex Rel. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brad v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Larsen v. RichardsonMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Shephard v. WidhalmMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Karlson v. ROSICHMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Sacrison v. EvjeneMontana Supreme Court · 2017