Legal Opinion

Whary v. Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2014No. DA 13-0635PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Eric Lance Whary, William Tiegs, and Donna Tiegs (Plaintiffs) appeal from an order of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, denying their motion for partial summary judgment and granting Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P.’s (Plum Creek) motion for summary judgment. We reverse and remand.

ISSUES

¶2 A restatement of the issues on appeal is:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in granting Plum Creek’s motion for summary judgment?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in finding that the scope of the easement was not limited to logging operations?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶5 This dispute…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pilgeram v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Mattson v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Guthrie v. HardyMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Tungsten Holdings, Inc. v. KimberlinMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Mason v. GarrisonMontana Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wicklund v. SundheimMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Woods v. ShannonMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Ballou v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. A.M. Welles, Inc. v. Montana Materials, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Archer v. TaitMontana Supreme Court · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API