Legal Opinion

Pilgrim v. Kuipers

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1984No. 83-212PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morrison

James Nedrow Pilgrim appeals from an order of the Fifth District Court, Beaverhead County, quieting title to two separate tracts of land in Pilgrim and defendant John Kuipers. We affirm.

The disputed property line originated when Pilgrim sold a portion of his property to one of Kuipers’ predecessors in interest (Brooks), retaining the remaining tract to himself.

The property description in this deed (Pilgrim to Brooks) contained at least one error and is demonstrably unreliable in that it does not close. The relevant part of the description is set forth as follows:

“(c) Beginning at quarter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Myrick v. PeetMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Reel v. WalterMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Schmuck v. BeckMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Tillinger v. FrisbieMontana Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kimball v. TurnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Ingles Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Larsen v. RichardsonMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Smithers v. HagermanMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Ash v. MerletteMontana Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API