Legal Opinion
In re Coopet
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 2008No. 07-BG-282PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
On December 12, 2006, the Supreme Court of California suspended the respondent, Michael W. Coopet, from the practice of law for two years, stayed in favor of probation for three years, with a nine-month actual suspension.1 The Board on Professional Responsibility for the District of Columbia (“the Board”) recommends imposing the identical reciprocal discipline. We accept the Board’s recommendation.
Mr. Coopet has been a member of the bar of this court since October 2,1985, and is also a member of the State of California Bar and the State of Minnesota Bar. On September 9, 2005, the Supreme…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re WechslerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re WeissDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re CoopetDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re William N. RogerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- IN RE ANDREA MERRITT-BAGWELLDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- In re Merritt-BagwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015