Friedline v. State

— This was an action by the State against Albert Friedline and the appellant, John Friedline, upon a forfeited recognizauce taken before a justice of the peace. There was a return of not found as to Albert. The appellant demurred to the complaint for want of facts to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was overruled. He 'then answered in five paragraphs, the first being the general denial. The appellee’s demurrer to the second paragraph, and its motion to strike out the third, fourth and fifth paragraphs of the answer were sustained. On a trial by jury, a verdict was returned for the…