Legal Opinion

Pritchett v. Cox

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1900No. 19,214PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

This was an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The complaint, which was verified, stated, in substance, that the petitioner was wrongfully restrained of his liberty at the county of Knox, in the State of Indiana, by John O. Cox, the sheriff of said county; that the cause of such restraint was a commitment by one E. A. Beach, a justice of the peace of said county, upon a. judgment in favor of the State of Indiana, and against the petitioner, for a fine of $5, with costs taxed at $27.95; that said restraint *109was illegal because, (1) said petitioner had violated no criminal law of the State…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Egan v. WoleverIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lowery v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Willis v. BaylesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. McLaughlin v. EtchisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Johns v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Daly, WardenIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Koepke v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Gillespie v. RumpIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Hunnicutt v. FrauhigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Stephenson v. DalyIndiana Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API