Legal Opinion
Kuerschner & Rauchwarenfabrik, A.G. v. New York Trust Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 13, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
Defendant has moved, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to dismiss the amended complaint as to the plaintiffs Julius Tsuk and Rudolf Tsuk upon the grounds that (1) it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted with respect to Julius Tsuk and Rudolf Tsuk and (2) this Court lacks jurisdiction over the claims asserted by Julius Tsuk and Rudolf Tsuk.
Additionally, defendant seeks security for costs, pursuant to Rule 2 of the Civil Rules of this Court; oral examination of the corporation Kuerschner & Rauchwarenfabrik, A.G. and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Propper v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- New York Life Insurance v. DunlevySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hanna v. . StedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Zittman v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zwack v. Kraus Bros. & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Brownell v. National City BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Brownell v. New York Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Kuerschner & Rauchwarenfabrik, A.G. v. New York Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Kuerschner & Rauchwarenfabrik, A.G. v. Swiss Bank Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954