Legal Opinion
Zittman v. McGrath
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 28, 1951No. 298PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson
On December 11, 1941, petitioner Zittman, holder of claims against the Deutsche Reichsbank and the Deutsche Golddiskontbank, caused attachment warrants to be issued by the appropriate New York court and levied on accounts maintained by the debtors in New York City with the Chase National Bank. On January 21, 1942, petitioner McCarthy, holder of a claim against the Reichsbank, also attached its accounts with the Chase *448Bank. Both attachments were followed by state court actions which were pursued to default judgments. The judgments remain unsatisfied because the attached funds were and are…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Propper v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Keeney v. . Home Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Commission for Polish Relief, Ltd. v. Banca Nationala a RumanieiNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Stokes v. . Hoffman House of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Weeks v. . WeeksNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Dames & Moore v. ReganSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Marilyn Kay Fernandez, Etc., Banco Nacional De Cuba, Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees, Gilbert McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Carr v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Limited, of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Itek Corporation v. The First National Bank of Boston, Bank Melli Iran, Itek Corporation v. The First National Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Orvis v. BrownellSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.