Kuerschner & Rauchwarenfabrik, A.G. v. Swiss Bank Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
McGOHEY, District Judge.
This is an action in which the individual plaintiffs, claiming to be the sole stockholders and officers of the corporate plaintiff, seek to recover a sum of money on deposit with the defendant’s New York agency. The defendant moves to dismiss this third amended complaint for lack of jurisdiction or in the alternative *671for leave to serve the notice provided for by Section 51-a of the New York Civil Practice Act. The plaintiffs also move to require that their depositions be taken by interrogatories rather than by oral examination in the United States.
The corporate…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.