Legal Opinion
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 11, 2016No. 15-55084PublishedCited by 2,381 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge OWENS; Concurrence by Judge SESSIONS; Dissent by Judge IKUTA.
OPINION
OWENS, Circuit Judge:
The Center for Auto Safety (CAS) appeals from the district court’s order denying CAS’s motions to intervene and unseal documents filed in a putative class action lawsuit between Chrysler Group, LLC (Chrysler) and certain named plaintiffs. Because the district court applied the incorrect standard when evaluating the mo*1095tion to unseal these documents, we vacate and remand for further proceedings.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 2013, plaintiffs filed a putative class action…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Greg Rushford, the Washington Post Company, Intervenor v. The New Yorker Magazine, Inc., and William Shawn Reneta AdlerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Kaley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Juan Aquas Romero v. Drummond Co. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,381 opinions
- Ervine v. Warden, San Quentin State PrisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- United States v. Roxanne CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Naruto v. David SlaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Ground Zero Center for Non-Violent Action v. United States Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Prostar Wireless Grp., LLC v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
2,376 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.