Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 28, 2010No. 08AB2468; A141070PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (board) determining that she did not qualify for unemployment compensation benefits because she was discharged from her employment for misconduct. ORS 657.176(2)(a) disqualifies a person who “[h]as been discharged for misconduct connected with work” from receiving unemployment compensation benefits. OAR 471-030-0038(3) defines “misconduct” as a “willful or wantonly negligent violation of the standards of behavior which an employer has the right to expect of an employee” and excludes conduct from that definition if it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Freeman v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Goin v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Smithee v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. PULLAM v. Employment Dept.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Pullam v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API