Legal Opinion

PULLAM v. Employment Dept.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 20, 2010No. 09AB2723 A143507PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

243 P.3d 71 (2010)

238 Or. App. 60

Irene M. PULLAM, Petitioner,

v.

EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and City of Winston, Respondents.

09AB2723; A143507.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted July 2, 2010.

Decided October 20, 2010.

Irene Pullam filed the brief pro se.

Denise G. Fjordbeck, Attorney-in-Charge, Civil/Administrative Appeals, waived appearance for respondent Employment Department.

David Van Dermark, City Administrator, waived appearance for respondent City of Winston.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge.

LANDAU, P.J.

In this unemployment compensation case, claimant seeks…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Pullam v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kay v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Barrera v. Employment Dept.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API