Legal Opinion

Smithee v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 13, 2009No. 06AB1970; A134559PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of an Employment Appeals Board (board) determination that he did not qualify for unemployment insurance benefits because he was discharged from his employment for misconduct. ORS 657.176(2)(a) disqualifies a person who “[h]as been discharged for misconduct connected with work” from receiving unemployment compensation benefits. Claimant contends that the board erroneously applied OAR 471-030-0038, a rule of the Oregon Employment Department (department) that defines “misconduct” by excluding conduct that is an “isolated instance of poor judgment.” ORS 657.282; ORS…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Freeman v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Johnson v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENTCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Ring v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Fox v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API