Legal Opinion
Steward v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 27, 2008No. 07-537CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
The court has before it defendant’s motion to dismiss this suit for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendant’s motion has been fully briefed, and oral argument was neither requested by the parties nor required by the court.2 For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND3
Mr. Steward alleges that certain items of his personal and business property were confiscated between March 2000 and July 2004 by agents of the United States. Compl. at 8, 10. The confiscations of property occurred in the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spencer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Akins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Todd Construction, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Young v. Larimer County Sheriff's OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Julio A. Ramos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.