Legal Opinion
Arrington v. City of MacOn
District Court, M.D. Georgia
Decided August 7, 1997No. 5:91-cv-182-4 (WDO)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
OWENS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed a motion for partial summary judgment concerning the issue of whether defendant City of Macon has satisfied the “salary test” regulations established by the Department of Labor (“DOL”) for determining whether an employee may be classified as exempt from the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. After careful consideration of the arguments of counsel, the relevant case law, and the record as a whole, the court issues the following order.
I. Summary judgment standard
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Irby v. BittickCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Cruz v. McAllister Bros., Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
- Reeves v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.