Legal Opinion
C. T. Hellmuth & Associates, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 21, 1976No. Civ. A. W-74-1222PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WATKINS, District Judge.
After unsuccessfully seeking access to certain records of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (hereinafter WMATA), Plaintiff instituted the instant action to compel disclosure. Jurisdiction is predicated upon § 81 of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Compact, Public Law 89-774, 80 Stat. 1324, 1350 (1966), Art. 41 § 317-81 Md.Ann.Code (1971 Repl. Vol.), which grants this Court jurisdiction over all actions brought by or against WMATA. 1 The case is presently
before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ernestine Robles v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Rao v. Port of New York AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1954
- Delaware River & Bay Authority v. New Jersey Public Employment Relations CommissionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Delaware River and Bay Authority v. CarelloCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1966
- Rao v. Port of New York AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bunk v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Ass'n v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Nardi v. Delaware River Port AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Lizzi v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Delaware River Port Authority v. Fraternal Order of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.