Legal Opinion
Rao v. Port of New York Authority
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 28, 1954No. Civ. 14013PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAYFIEL, District Judge.
The defendant, The Port of New York Authority, appears specially and moves to dismiss the complaint as against it on the ground that this Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter thereof and over the person of this defendant.
It bases its motion on the failure of the plaintiff to comply with the provisions of Chapter 301 of the Laws of the State of New York, 1950, and Chapter 204 of the Laws of New Jersey, 1951, in the following two respects: (1) that the plaintiff failed to commence this action within one year after the accident, which is the subject matter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. MichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Munro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- FERD. MULHENS, INC. v. HigginsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- ZAMEL, ET UX. v. Port of NY AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Tripee v. Port of New York AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- C. T. Hellmuth & Associates, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
- United States Steel Corp. v. Multistate Tax CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Luciano v. Fanberg Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.