Legal Opinion
Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Ass'n v. City of Camden
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 9, 1988PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
O’HERN, J.
This case presents a troublesome dilemma for resolution. It involves a cooperative undertaking by a bi-state agency and a New Jersey municipal agency to create in New Jersey a downtown mass transportation center. Such a center will serve the laudable public goals of reducing dependence on automobiles, improving public transportation, and strengthening an inner city area. Both the Camden Housing Authority and the Delaware River Port Authority (DRPA), a bi-state agency of New Jersey and Pennsylvania, had the best of intentions. Under their…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- West Virginia Ex Rel. Dyer v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Port Authority Bondholders Protective Committee, Henry W. Klein, Alvin S. Lane, Adele W. Ginsberg and Morris L. Lewy v. Port of New York AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission v. ColburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bunk v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Ballinger v. Delaware River Port AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- King v. Port Authority of New York and New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Redbird Engineering Sales, Inc. v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 542 v. Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.