Rao v. Port of New York Authority
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The case is properly before us, by reason of the new notice of appeal filed after the district judge had issued the certificate under Rule 54(b), Fed. Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A., which is necessary to give us jurisdiction.
This brings us to the question whether the subject-matter of the order was within- Rule 54(b), or whether, as the appellee contends, the order below, dismissing the complaint against the Port Authority, disposed only of part of a single claim. As we read the complaint, the action was one in which the plaintiff sought to hold the Port Authority and its co-defendant jointly…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Lopinsky v. Hertz Drive-Ur-Self Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
3Cited by11 opinions
- Feliciano Ruiz v. Alfonso Development Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1968
- C. T. Hellmuth & Associates, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
- Rao v. Port of New York AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Williams v. National Car Rental System, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- William R. Russell and Mrs. Anna L. Russell, His Wife v. George W. Hackworth, Frank R. BraleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.