Legal Opinion

Brown v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1914No. L.A. No. 3054PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. George E. Church, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiffs, who were the wife and daughter of John W. Brown, sued to recover damages for his death which was caused by one of defendant’s electric cars operated over a line of railway extending from Los Angeles to Long Beach. After the introduction of all the evidence on behalf of plaintiffs the defendant moved for a nonsuit. The motion was granted and judgment was entered accordingly. Prom this judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial plaintiffs appeal.

John W. Brown was killed by a car of the defendant corporation at the crossing of the latter’s tracks with Vernon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Hoff v. Los Angeles Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Starck v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Chrissinger v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Gore v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Davis v. John Breuner Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Kauffman v. MacHin Shirt Co.California Supreme Court · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API