Legal Opinion

United States v. Emma Jean Greathouse

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 26, 1973No. 72-2004PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN W. REYNOLDS, District Judge.

Defendant Emma Jean Greathouse was convicted in a court trial of three counts of transporting and negotiating forged securities in violation of 18 U.S. C.A. § 2314. She now claims she was denied a fair trial because the presiding judge had previously read the presen-tence report of codefendant Bob Greene who testified against her and because this same presentence report, which tended to impeach Greene, was not disclosed to her attorney.

In August 1971, defendant collaborated with Greene to forge and cash securities of the Eastman-Kodak Company. Defendant made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Alastair Kyle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. United States v. Chester Dewitt MenkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Gene Earl Evans, United States v. Carl David EvansCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Ronald Fox, A/K/A Ronald Wroblewski, Joseph G. Vajner and Ulysses C. GillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. PostOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. United States v. Michael J. Corbitt, Pulitzer Community Newspapers, Inc., Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Charmer Industries, Inc., and Peerless Importers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Skeeter Cyphers and David WillmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. SchletteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API