Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael J. Corbitt, Pulitzer Community Newspapers, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 19, 1989No. 88-2746PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires that we decide whether, and under what circumstances, a district court may release the presentence investigation report of a criminal defendant to members of the news media. The district court authorized disclosure of the defendant’s presentence report under the “common law right of access” to judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 485 U.S. 589, 98 S.Ct. 1306, 55 L.Ed.2d 570 (1978). The government appeals, arguing that the district court applied an incorrect legal standard in determining whether disclosure was appropriate. We…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Phillips v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Leucadia, Inc. v. Applied Extrusion Technologies, Inc., Richard I. Burstein, Proposed IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Spotted ElkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API