United States v. Gene Earl Evans, United States v. Carl David Evans
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ELMO B. HUNTER, District Judge.
On this appeal by appellants, Gene Earl Evans and Carl David Evans, from their conviction and sentence in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for post office burglary, two primary questions are presented for our review. One is whether the trial court erred in not suppressing the testimony of certain witnesses and items under the “fruit of the poison tree” doctrine. The other concerns whether the trial court erred in not providing appellants with certain presen-tence and psychiatric information and reports. The pertinent facts…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Charmer Industries, Inc., and Peerless Importers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Martin Willard Houltin and Kenneth B. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- People v. BriggsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- United States v. Claude AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. David MarderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.