Legal Opinion

Alves v. Bumguardner

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1975No. 7921PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION. Per Curiam:

Appellants contend the district court erroneously determined that the parties intended certain small tools and equipment to be included in the sale of appellants’ ranch to respondents.

The court’s determination is based on substantial evidence and will not be set aside on appeal. County of Clark v. Lucas, 91 Nev. 263, 534 P.2d 499 (1975); Kulik v. Albers Incorporated, 91 Nev. 134, 532 P.2d 603 (1975); Fletcher v. Fletcher, 89 Nev. 540, 516 P.2d 103 (1973); Picking v. Day and Night Elec., Inc., 87 Nev. 5, 479 P.2d 461 (1971).

Appellants argue that the Uniform Commercial Code…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. FletcherNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Britz v. Consolidated Casinos Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Young Electric Sign Co. v. Erwin Electric Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. County of Clark v. LucasNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Howarth v. EL SOBRANTE MINING CORPORATIONNevada Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Levers v. Rio King Land & Investment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Holland Livestock Ranch v. B & C ENTERPRISESNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  3. J & J Building Contractors, Inc. v. Savage Construction, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Mountain Shadows of Incline v. KopshoNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Penrose v. O'HaraNevada Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API