Mountain Shadows of Incline v. Kopsho
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The district court awarded respondent a judgment against appellant based on an oral employment contract between the parties. Appellant contends we must reverse because the district court erred by finding (1) there was a binding contract, and (2) there was no accord and satisfaction of appellant’s obligations.
1. We reject appellant’s contention that it cannot be bound by its employment contract because the contract was not reduced to a written agreement and signed by the parties. “ ‘Where a complete contract was made orally, the fact that it was expected that a written contract would…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Thompson v. SchurmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Wolf v. Humboldt CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Walden v. BackusNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- Micheletti v. FugittNevada Supreme Court · 1943
- Alves v. BumguardnerNevada Supreme Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Pederson v. First Nat. Bank of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- Forman v. United Health Products, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2020