Legal Opinion

Penrose v. O'Hara

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1976No. 8251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*686OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Herbert Penrose sought declaratory relief, damages, and an injunction due to respondents’ interference with his fabrication of modular homes on land zoned for single family dwellings pursuant to Lyon County Ordinance No. 50.1 The district court, finding that no non-conforming use existed on appellant’s land at the time of the Ordinance’s enactment and that respondents were not estopped to enforce the Ordinance, denied appellant relief.

1. Because the fabrication of modular homes will be only temporary, appellant argues his land use is not violative of Ordinance No. 50.…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Britz v. Consolidated Casinos Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Light Co. v. HoughtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Alves v. BumguardnerNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  4. County of Clark v. LucasNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Howarth v. EL SOBRANTE MINING CORPORATIONNevada Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Industries, Inc. v. United Mortgage Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Laird v. State of Nevada Public Employees Retirement BoardNevada Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API