Holland Livestock Ranch v. B & C ENTERPRISES
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Here, both sides raise numerous issues on appeal and cross-appeal. After reviewing the record, we conclude the issues presented are either raised for the first time on appeal, supported by no relevant authority, or concern determinations which are based on substantial evidence. For these reasons, and because neither side has affirmatively demonstrated error, the judgment is affirmed. Peot v. Peot, 92 Nev. 388, 551 P.2d 242 (1976). Charmicor, Inc. v. Bradshaw Finance Co., 92 Nev. 310, 550 P.2d 413 (1976); Alves v. Bumguardner, 91 Nev. 799, 544 P.2d 436 (1975); County of Clark v. Lucas,…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Charmicor, Inc. v. BRADSHAW FINANCE COMPANYNevada Supreme Court · 1976
- Peot v. PeotNevada Supreme Court · 1976
- Alves v. BumguardnerNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- County of Clark v. LucasNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Kulik v. Albers IncorporatedNevada Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by23 opinions
- State, Employment Security Department v. WeberNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- City Plan Development, Inc. v. Office of the Labor CommissionerNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Goldman Ex Rel. Goldman-Wilson v. Nevada Commission on Judicial DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- State Ex Rel. State Board of Equalization v. BakstNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Watson v. WatsonNevada Supreme Court · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.