Legal Opinion
Jones v. United States
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided June 19, 1998No. 4:92CV3029PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
KOPF, District Judge.
Terry and Pat Jones, and the companies they own, seek damages pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7431(e) in their suit against the United States based on an Internal Revenue Agent’s disclosure of tax return information to a confidential informant which allegedly resulted in damage to the Joneses and their companies. Following a bench trial and subsequent briefing by the parties on the issue of damages, I now issue my findings of fact and conclusions of law 1 in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a). For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jin Ku Kim, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Nash Finch Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- United States v. Harvey M. RenvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Evans v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Manning v. BuchanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- National Organization for Marriage, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- National Organization for Marriage v. US, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.