Legal Opinion

National Organization for Marriage v. US, Internal Revenue Service

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 2, 2015No. 14-2363PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge AGEE joined.

DIAZ, Circuit Judge:

The National Organization for Marriage (“NOM”) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion under 26 U.S.C. § 7431(c)(3) to collect attorneys’ fees from the Internal Revenue Service. NOM contends that the district court abused its discretion by determining that NOM was not a “prevailing party” under 26 U.S.C. § 7430(c)(4)(A) because (1) it did not “substantially prevail! ] [in litigation against the IRS] with respect to the amount in controversy, or ... the most…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. United States v. PaisleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  5. Edward J. Kaffenberger Cora S. Kaffenberger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  2. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc. v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
  3. Gitwaza v. GarlandDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024
  4. Gonzalez v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
  5. Sanitary Brd of Charleston v. Andrew WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API